UTAH DIVORCE
Please select from below for applicable Utah statutes and explanations:
* This is by no means intended to be a
complete description of divorce law in the State of Utah.
This page is intended
to give a litigant an idea of the divorce process and various
procedural and statutory requirements. A complete description
of rights, obligations, and requirements can be found in
the Utah Annotated Code and the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.
Do not rely on this page alone for guidance. Please consult
with an attorney. This page does not create an attorney-client
relationship.
Please contact Edward Stone for more information.
Divorce
in Utah - Residency Requirement |
One of the parties must be an actual resident
of the State of Utah and the county in which the
complaint
is filed, or stationed if in the military, for a
period of three months prior to the filing of the
complaint. This
residency requirement is mandatory and cannot be
overcome by stipulation or consent, as the residency
establishes
the District Court's jurisdiction over the matter.
If the Court finds that the residency requirement
has not been met, then the Court has no power to
enter
orders. Once a court determines that the residency
requirement is satisfied, it retains continuing jurisdiction
for all future modifications. Jurisdiction over a
non-resident turns on a two part test: (1) the claim
against the
non-resident must arise from activities enumerated
in the Utah long arm statute. The applicable portion
of the statute for divorce is that the nonresident
spouse must have resided in Utah during the marital
relationship or a purposeful act by the nonresident
spouse within the State.
Statute:
Utah Code, Section 30-3-1
30-3-1.
Residence.
(2) The court may decree a dissolution of the marriage
contract between the petitioner and respondent
on the grounds specified in Subsection (3) in all
cases where
the petitioner or respondent has been an actual
and bona fide resident of this state and of the
county
where the action is brought, or if members of the
armed forces of the United States who are not legal
residents
of this state, where the petitioner has been stationed
in this state under military orders, for three
months next prior to the commencement of the action.
|
|
Divorce In Utah
- Grounds
|
The standard by which the Plaintiff spouse must
prove grounds for divorce is by substantial and satisfactory
evidence. As a practical matter, most divorce actions
are brought on the grounds of irreconcilable differences.
Bringing an action on fault grounds is usually limited
to actions when fault may favorably affect an alimony
or property distribution award. Grounds for divorce
are as follows: (a) impotency of the respondent at
the time of marriage; (b) adultery committed by the
respondent subsequent to marriage; (c) willful desertion
of the petitioner by the respondent for more than
one year; (d) willful neglect of the respondent to
provide for the petitioner the common necessaries
of life; (e) habitual drunkenness of the respondent;
(f) conviction of the respondent for a felony; (g)
cruel treatment of the petitioner by the respondent
to the extent of causing bodily injury or great mental
distress to the petitioner; (h) irreconcilable differences
of the marriage; (i) incurable insanity; or (j) when
the husband and wife have lived separately under
a decree of separate maintenance of any state for
three consecutive years without cohabitation.
Statute:
Utah Code, Section 30-3-1
30-3-1. Grounds.
(3) Grounds for divorce:
(a) impotency of the
respondent at the time of marriage;
(b)
adultery committed by the respondent subsequent
to marriage;
(c) willful desertion of the petitioner
by the respondent for more
than one year;
(d) willful neglect of the respondent
to provide for the petitioner
the common necessaries of
life;
(e) habitual drunkenness of
the respondent;
(f) conviction of the respondent
for a felony;
(g) cruel treatment of
the petitioner by the
respondent to the extent
of causing bodily
injury or great mental
distress to the petitioner;
(h) irreconcilable differences
of the marriage;
(i) incurable insanity;
or
(j) when the husband
and wife have lived
separately under
a decree
of separate maintenance
of any state for
three consecutive
years
without cohabitation.
(4) A decree of divorce
granted under Subsection (3)(j) does not
affect the liability of either
party under any provision for separate
maintenance previously
granted.
(5)(a) A divorce may not
be granted on the grounds of insanity unless:
(i)
the respondent has been adjudged insane by
the appropriate authorities
of this or another
state
prior to the commencement
of the action; and
(ii) the court finds by the
testimony of competent witnesses that
the insanity of the respondent
is incurable.
(b) The court
shall appoint for the respondent a guardian
ad
litem who
shall protect the interests
of the respondent. A
copy of the summons and complaint
shall be served on the
respondent
in person or by publication,
as provided
by the laws
of this
state
in other actions for
divorce, or upon his guardian ad
litem, and
upon the
county attorney for
the county where the
action is prosecuted.
(c) The county attorney
shall investigate the
merits of the
case and if the
respondent resides
out of
this state, take depositions
as necessary, attend
the proceedings, and
make a
defense as is just
to protect the rights
of the
respondent
and the interests
of the state.
(d) In all actions
the court and judge
have
jurisdiction over
the payment
of alimony, the
distribution
of property, and
the custody
and maintenance of
minor children, as
the courts
and
judges possess in
other actions for
divorce.
(e) The petitioner
or respondent may,
if the
respondent
resides in this
state, upon notice,
have the respondent
brought into the
court at trial,
or have an
examination of
the respondent by two
or more competent
physicians,
to determine the
mental condition
of
the respondent.
For this purpose either
party
may
have leave
from the court
to enter any asylum
or institution
where
the respondent
may be confined. The
costs of
court in this
action
shall
be apportioned
by the court.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Waiting Period
|
In a divorce action, the parties must normally
wait 90 days between the time of filing and a final
hearing. The requirement may be waived upon a showing
of good cause, or if both parents have attended the
mandatory educational program required for divorcing
parents in Utah. The court may also shorten the 90
day waiting period in a default action where consent
has been given to proceed. The court has the power
to delay granting a divorce when critical issues
arise, i.e. health insurance, tax obligations. Similarly,
a court may grant a divorce prior to resolving other
issues in the case such as marital property. Divorces
are not final merely with the passage of the waiting
period. An order must be presented and signed by
a judge before a divorce is final.
Statute:
Utah Code, Section 30-3-18
30-3-18. Waiting period for hearing after
filing for divorce--Exemption--Use of counseling
and
education services not to be construed as condonation
or promotion
(1) Unless the court, for good cause shown
and set forth in the findings, otherwise
orders, no hearing
for decree of divorce shall be held by the
court
until 90 days shall have elapsed from the
filing of the complaint, provided the court may
make
such interim orders as may be just and equitable.
(2) The 90-day period as provided in Subsection
(1) shall not apply in any case where both
parties have
completed the mandatory educational course
for divorcing parents as provided in Section
30-3-11.3
or the mediation
requirement as provided in Section 30-3-21.
(3) The use of counseling, mediation, and
education services provided under this
chapter may not
be construed as condoning the acts that
may constitute grounds
for divorce on the part of either spouse
nor of promoting divorce.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Recovery of Attorney's Fees
|
A court will commonly award attorney fees where
one spouse is the dominant wage earner. This is to
compensate for an otherwise unfair advantage the
financially dominant spouse would have in a divorce,
and provides the financially dependent spouse the
means to present the best case possible, or recover
from otherwise financially crippling attorney's fees.
Courts have awarded attorney's fees where one party
has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or
for oppressive reasons. Courts have also awarded
attorney fees where one party has acted as a private
attorney general and sued on behalf of a strong or
societal important public policy. The decision to
award attorney fees lies within the sound discretion
of the court. The requesting part must demonstrate:
(1) need; (2) the ability of the other spouse to
pay; (3) the reasonableness of the fee.
Statute:
Utah Code, Section 30-3-3
30-3-3. Award of costs,
attorney and witness fees--Temporary alimony
(1) In any action filed under Title 30,
Chapter 3, 4, or 6, and in any action to establish
an order
of custody, visitation, child support, alimony,
or division of property in a domestic case,
the court
may order a party to pay the costs, attorney
fees, and witness fees, including expert
witness fees,
of the other party to enable the other party
to prosecute or defend the action. The order
may include provision
for costs of the action.
(2) In any action
to enforce an order of custody, visitation, child
support, alimony,
or division
of property in a domestic case, the court
may award
costs and attorney fees upon determining
that the party substantially prevailed
upon the
claim or defense.
The court, in its discretion, may award
no fees or limited fees against a party if the
court
finds the
party is impecunious or enters in the record
the reason for not awarding fees.
(3) In
any action listed in Subsection (1), the court
may order a party to provide
money,
during
the pendency
of the action, for the separate support
and maintenance of the other party and
of any
children in the
custody of the other party.
(4) Orders
entered under this section prior to entry of
the final order or
judgment
may be amended
during
the course of the action or in the
final order or judgment.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Divorce Education Classes
|
It is stated policy in Utah
to strengthen family and discourage divorce. If
the plaintiff and defendant
have one or more children, a divorce may not be
granted until both parties have attended a mandatory
divorce
education course. A certification of completion
must be presented to the court. The court may waive
the
requirement by motion of one of the parties or
sua sponte if the court determines that attendance
and
completion is not necessary, appropriate, feasible,
or in the best interests of the parties or the
children. A Notice of Requirement to Attend Mandatory
Divorce
Education Class must be served on the opposing
party. The course is designed to sensitize the
parties to
the needs of their children and to instruct the
parties about divorce and its impact on their family
relationships,
as well as the ongoing financial responsibilities.
Statute:
Utah Code, Section 30-3-4
30-3-4. Pleadings--Findings--Decree--Use
of affidavit--Sealing.
(1)(a) The complaint shall be in writing
and signed by the plaintiff or plaintiff's
attorney.
(b) A decree of divorce may
not be granted upon default or otherwise except
upon legal
evidence taken in
the cause. If the decree is to be entered
upon the default of the defendant, evidence
to support
the
decree may be submitted upon the affidavit
of the plaintiff with the approval of
the
court.
(c) If the plaintiff and the defendant
have a child or children, a decree of divorce
may not be granted
until both parties have attended
the mandatory course described in Section 30-3-11.3,
and have presented
a certificate of course completion
to
the
court. The court may waive this requirement,
on its
own motion or on the motion of one
of the parties, if
it determines course attendance and
completion are not necessary, appropriate,
feasible,
or in the best
interest of the parties.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Annulment
|
An annulment treats a marriage
as it it had never happened. Annulments are unusual
and oftentimes difficult
to prove.
Utah Code Section 30-1-17.1
Annulment- Grounds for.
A marriage may be annulled
for any of the following causes existing
at the time of the marriage:
(1) When the marriage
is prohibited or void under Title 30, Chapter
1
(2) Upon grounds existing at common law.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Sealing Court Files
|
Upon a request by either party,
the Court may seal the file. With a few limited
exceptions, once a file
is sealed by the court the public does not have
access to its contents. The portions of the file
that are
not sealed is the decree of divorce itself, and
pleadings filed after the entry of a judgment of
divorce seeking
to enforce or amend the decree.
Statute:
Utah Code, Section 30-3-4
30-3-4. Sealing.
(2) The file, except the decree of divorce, may
be sealed by order of the court upon the motion
of either
party. The sealed portion of the file is
available to the public only upon an order
of the court.
The concerned parties, the attorneys of record
or attorney
filing a notice of appearance in the action,
the Office of Recovery Services if a party
to the proceedings
has applied for or is receiving public assistance,
or the court, have full access to the entire
record. This sealing does not apply to subsequent
filings
to enforce or amend the decree.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Common Law Marriages
|
In 1987, Utah passed a common
law marriage stature. The law only applies the
marriages entered into after
this date and is not retroactive. In order to prove
consent, there must be some evidence beyond living
together and reputation in the community. Some
considerations are the establishment of joint banking
accounts,
joint ownership of property, filing joint tax returns
and so on.
Utah Code, Section 30-1-4.5
30-1-4.5 Common Law Marriages.
Utah recognizes
a common law marriage if a court or administrative
order established:
1. Consent. The parties must
be capable of giving consent.
2. Capacity. The
parties must be legally capable of entering
a marriage.
3. Cohabitation. The parties must
have cohabitated.
4. Assumption of marital
rights and duties. The parties must mutually
assume marital
rights, obligations, and duties.
5. Holding
out. The parties must hold themselves out
and have acquired
a reputation as husband
and wife.
|
|
Divorce in Utah
- Enforcement of Pre-Nuptial Agreements
|
Utah has adopted the Uniform Premarital Act.
- Consideration not required.
-
Writing Requirement.
A premarital contract, an amended agreement,
and revocation of a premarital
agreement must be in writing and signed by
both parties.
-
Contents. Parties to a premarital
contract may contract with respect to: (1) the
rights
and obligations
of each party in any property of either or
both of them; (2) right to transfer a security
interest
in
a mortgage; (3) disposition of property upon
separation, divorce, or death; (4) modification
or elimination
of spousal support; (5) ownership rights
in and disposition of the death benefit or a life
insurance
policy;
(6) choice of law governing the agreement,
except that a court may apply the law of
the
legal domicile
of either party, if it is fair and equitable.
- The parties may not contract with respect to
the right of a child to support, health
and medical provider
expenses, medical insurance, and child
care coverage.
Enforcement
A premarital contract is not enforceable
if the party against whom enforcement
is sought
proves
that:
- Involuntary execution. The
party did not execute the agreement voluntarily.
-
Fraudulent agreement. The agreement was fraudulent
when the agreement
was executed and the before
execution the party: (1) was
not provided a reasonable disclosure
of the other party's property
or financial obligations; (2) did not voluntarily
and expressly waive in
writing any right to disclosure
of
the other
party's property
or financial obligations; and
(3)
did not have, or reasonably could not have
had,
adequate knowledge of the other
party's property or
financial obligations.
-
Modification
or Elimination of Spousal Support. If a premarital
agreement
eliminates or modifies
support or alimony to such
an extent that one party becomes
eligible for
public aid,
a court
may, regardless
of the agreement, require the
other party to provide support
necessary
to avoid
that eligibility.
|
|
|